Syndromic testing as a diagnostic modality for gastrointestinal infection
Abstract
Indonesia continues to grapple with sanitation issues, contributing to high incidence of gastrointestinal infections. Timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial to minimize the use of empirical antibiotics and medical expenses. Microbial culture, the current gold standard for diagnosing infections, has certain limitations in terms of duration and accuracy. There is a novel multiplex PCR (mPCR)-based diagnostic approach for infections called syndromic testing that can identify up to 20 pathogens simultaneously within 1–2 hours. This evidence-based case report aims to evaluate its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in diagnosing gastrointestinal infections. Literature search was conducted on February 21, 2024, across several databases which were PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, and ProQuest. Two prospective cross-sectional studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria which were then critically appraised. Both studies measured the diagnostic accuracy of syndromic testing for Salmonella and Shigella, yielding sensitivity of 75–95.2%, specificity of >98%, PPV up to 88.2%, and NPV of >99%, indicating its good accuracy. Syndromic testing presents as a promising alternative diagnostic modality for infections, addressing the limitations of culture-based methods.
References
Liu Q, Jin X, Cheng J, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Dai Y. Advances in the application of molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of infectious disease pathogens (Review). Mol Med Rep. 2023 Apr 3;27(5):104.
Isnawati A, Gitawati R, Raini M, Alegantina S, Setiawaty V. Indonesia basic health survey: Self-medication profile for diarrhea with traditional medicine. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(3):2365–71.
Misganaw D, Abtew K. Evaluation of Antibiotic Utilization Pattern During Acute Diarrheal Disease at Chefa-Robit Health Center, Kemissie, North East Amhara, Ethiopia. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;Volume 12:169–75.
Kementerian Kesehatan. Laporan kinerja Direktorat Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit Menular. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2022.
Wang T, Wang G, Shan CX, Sun YQ, Ren X, Yu LJ, et al. Comparative study on epidemiological and etiological characteristics of patients with acute diarrhea with febrile or non-febrile symptoms in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023;12(1):1–12.
Hu ZD, Gu B. Laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases: a call for more rapid and accurate methods. Akimkin VG, editor. Ann Transl Med. 2020 May;8(9):600–600.
Dumkow LE, Worden LJ, Rao SN. Syndromic diagnostic testing: a new way to approach patient care in the treatment of infectious diseases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Sep 23;76(Supplement_3):iii4–11.
Knoth C, Humphries R, Johnson JK, Patel A, Lima A, Silbert S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of BioCode GPP for syndromic molecular detection of gastrointestinal pathogens from stool specimens. Ledeboer NA, editor. J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Feb 8;0(0).
Beckman AK, Ferrieri P. Prospective investigation of an automated PCR/nucleic acid microarray-based platform for enteric pathogen testing. Lab Med. 2019 Oct 10;50(4):390–5.
Kramme S, Dähne T, Fomenko A, Panning M. Acute viral gastrointestinal (GI) infections in the tropics—a role for cartridge-based multiplex PCR panels? Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 May 19;7(5):80.
S?ndulescu O, Streinu-Cercel A, Mo?oi MM, Streinu-Cercel A, Preo?escu LL. Syndromic testing in infectious diseases: from diagnostic stewardship to antimicrobial stewardship. Antibiotics. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):6.
Axelrad JE, Freedberg DE, Whittier S, Greendyke W, Lebwohl B, Green DA. Impact of gastrointestinal panel implementation on health care utilization and outcomes. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(3):1–8.
Torres-Miranda D, Akselrod H, Karsner R, Secco A, Silva-Cantillo D, Siegel MO, et al. Use of BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal PCR panel associated with reductions in antibiotic use, time to optimal antibiotics, and length of stay. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):1–7.