Perbandingan Tepung Ketan dan Labu Siam (Sechium Edule) Terhadap Karakteristik Dodol

  • I Gede Arisudana Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Warmadewa
  • Anak Agung Made Semariyani Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Putu Candra Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Warmadewa
  • Luh Suriati Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: dodol, glutinous flour, squash

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the ratio of glutinous rice flour and the squash to the resulting dodol characteristics, and to obtain the appropriate ratio of glutinous flour and pistachio to produce dodol with good characteristics and acceptable to consumers. This study used Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 6 (six) comparative treatments namely: T0 (100% glutinous flour: 0% squash); T1 (80% glutinous flour: 20% squash): T2 (70% glutinous flour: 30% squash); T3 (60% glutinous flour: 40% squash); T4 (50% glutinous flour: 50% squash and T5 (40% glutinous flour and 60% squash) Each treatment was repeated 3 times to obtain 18 units of experiments. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the ratio of glutinous flour and gourd flakes have significant effect on water content, ash content, crude fiber content, pH, total sugar, texture, aroma, flavor and overall acceptance of dodol squash. The ratio of 70% starch flour and 30% pumpkin yields a good dodol of cauliflower and not significantly different from the control (100% glutinous flour: 0% squash). Characteristic dodol pumpkin with a ratio of 70% glutinous flour: 30% squash is as follows: water content 19.774%, ash 0.763%, crude fiber 0.925 %, pH 6.270, total sugar 14.660 brix, 4.286 (chewy, elastic, non-breakable) texture taste, 3.000 aroma (somewhat typical dodol squash), 4.286 (sweet legit) flavor, overall acceptance 5.714 (likes) and all these characteristics meet per the requirement of SNI dodol (SNI 01-2986-1992).

References

Anonim (2009). Dodol dari labu siam. http.sinartani.com/pascapanen/dodol-bahan-labusiam.6 mei 2009.

AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analisis. Asosiaion of Official Analitic Chemist. Washington DC. USA

Hanafiah, K.A. (1993). Rancangan Percobaan Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta :Rajawali Pers

Modgil, M., Modgil, R., & Kuma, R. (2004). Carbohydrate and Mineral Content of Chyote (Sechium edule) and Bottle Gourd (Lagenaria Siceraria). Hum Ecol. 15(2): 157-159.

Prayitno, S. (2002). Aneka Olahan Dodol. Yogyakarta : Kanisius.

Saade, R. L. (1996). Chayote. Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, 8-46.

Soekarto (1985). Penilaian Organoleptik Untuk Industri Pangan dan Hasil Pertanian.Jakarta: Bhatara Aksara.

Sudarmadji, S., Haryono, B., & Suhardi (1984). Prosedur Analisa untuk Bahan Makanan dan Pertanian. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Sudarmadji, S., Haryono, B., & Suhardi (1996). Analisa Bahan Makanan dan Pertanian. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty.

Sudarmadji S., Haryono,B., dan Suhardi (1997). Prosedur Analisa untuk Bahan Makanan dan Pertanian. Liberty. Yogyakarta.

Sulaeman, A., F. Anwar, Rimbawan, S.A. Marliyati (1994). Metode Penetapan Zat Gizi. Jurusan Gizi Masyarakat dan Sumberdaya Keluarga, Fakultas Pertanian IPB, Bogor.

Published
2018-05-03
How to Cite
Arisudana, I. G., Semariyani, A. A. M., Candra, I. P., & Suriati, L. (2018). Perbandingan Tepung Ketan dan Labu Siam (Sechium Edule) Terhadap Karakteristik Dodol. Gema Agro, 23(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.22225/ga.23.1.656.33-43
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 554 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 1113 times