LEGAL PROTECTION OF FAMOUS BRANDS BASED ON LAW NUMBER 20 OF 2016 CONCERNING BRANDS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Abstract
Brand protection (including well-known brands) in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications replacing the previous regulation, namely Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Marks. Even though there are already regulations in place, brand disputes in Indonesia still often occur, especially similarities in essence. The title adopted by the author in writing this thesis is "Legal Protection of Famous Brands Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Famous Brands and Geographical Indications." The research method used in this research is a normative legal research method. The purpose of this research is to find out or answer the questions: 1) Does Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Famous Marks and Geographical Indications provide a guarantee of protection for famous brands in Indonesia? 2) Has Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Famous Marks and Geographical Indications been truly implemented so that it can guarantee optimal protection of ownership of famous brands in Indonesia?
Based on the analysis of the research results, the author concludes that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications has guaranteed protection for well-known brands in Indonesia. This protection is specifically contained in Article 21 paragraph (1) letters b and c, and Article 83 paragraph (2). Then it is clarified in the Explanation of Article 21 paragraph (1) letter b, Explanation of Article 76 paragraph (2), and Explanation of Article 83 paragraph (2). The next conclusion is that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications has not been implemented optimally so that it cannot guarantee satisfactory protection of ownership of well-known brands in Indonesia. The Panel of Judges at both the District Court and Supreme Court levels did not implement the mandate of Law Number 20 of 2016
References
Frey, A. H., & Black, H. C. (1934). Black’s Law Dictionary. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register. https://doi.org/10.2307/3308065
Sutedi, A. (2009). Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Insan Budi Maulana, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Asing Di Indonesia Dari Masa Ke Masa, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999, Hal. 170
UNDANG-UNDANG
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 1994. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 tahun 1994 Tentang Ratifikasi Perjanjian Pembentukan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia 2001.Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek 2016. Undang-UndangNomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis
JURNAL HUKUM
Citra R. Budiman. 2019. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal (Well-Known) Di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum. Vol. XXIII No. 1, Januari – Juni 2019, Hal.1-18, dalam uid.ac.id https://ojs.uid.ac.id › jrh› article › download, Minggu, 04 November 2023, pukul 11.40 WIB.
Dendy W. Chandra, Budi Santoso, Novira M.i Sukma.2020. Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Asing yang Belum Terdaftar di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Sengketa Merek KEEN). NOTARIUS, Volume 13 Nomor 1 (2020) dalam https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index. php/notarius/article/› article › download pada Jumat, 03 November 2023 pukul 15:20 WIB
Erlina, 2018.“Aspek YuridisTerhadapAkuisisi Merek Perusahaan,†Vol. 5 No. 2 (Desember 2018),h.88. http:// http://journal. ac.id/index.php/ Jurisprudentie/article /view/6466/5566. › article › download, Sabtu, 04 November 202, pukul 19.34 WIB.
Karmila Hippy. 2013, Praktik Ratifikasi Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia. ejournal.ac.id. DiaksespadaSenin, 06 November 2023 pukul 10:00 WIB
Munawaroh Siti. 2006. Peran TRIPS (Trade related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights) Terhadap Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang Teknologi Informasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, Vol. XI Nomor 1 Januari 2006. Neliti https://media.neliti.com › media › publications download, Selasa, 07 November 2023, pukul 20.01 WIB