Legal Liability of Corporations on License Violating in Utilizing Coastal Border For Sustainable Tourism Development in Bali Province

Gede Agung Wirawan Nusantara; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha

doi:10.55637/elg.3.2.8477.128-133

Gede Agung Wirawan Nusantara Doctor of Law Study Program, Postgraduate Program Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha Doctor of Law Study Program, Postgraduate Program Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha Doctor of Law Study Program, Postgraduate Program Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55637/elg.3.2.8477.128-133

Keywords: Corporate Liability, Coastal Borders, Sustainable Tourism Development

Abstract

Legal liability for corporations that violate permits for using coastal borders for sustainable tourism development in Bali Province aims to examine the effectiveness of law enforcement against violations committed by corporations in utilizing coastal border areas. This research uses empirical legal research. The problem approaches used in this research proposal are the legislative approach, case approach, sociological approach, historical approach, and comparative legal approach. A comparative legal approach is carried out by comparing legal regulations in other countries, namely Canada, Norway, and Japan which have long coastlines. The philosophical basis for regulating corporate responsibility for violating permits in utilizing coastal borderline provisions in the 2nd and 5th principles of Pancasila. The effectiveness of law enforcement against permit violations by corporations in utilizing coastal border provisions for sustainable development is ineffective considering that cases of coastal border violations have not been resolved in accordance with normative provisions. The formulation of legal liability for corporations that violate coastal border permits for sustainable development is carried out with consideration of sustainable tourism development, which requires the formulation of non-litigation resolution of coastal border permit violations, namely with a Restorative Justice model mechanism.

References

Ali, A. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence): Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ali, M. (2015). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi. Rajawali Pers.

Braithwaite, J. (2001). Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195136395.001.0001

Geis, G. (2011). White-Collar and Corporate Crime. Greenwood.

Halilah, S., & Arif, Mhd. F. (2021). Asas Kepastian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli. Siyasah: Jurnl Hukum Tata Negara, 4(2).

Hariyono, T. (2021). Mediasi Penal sebagai Alternatif Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v2i1.8731

Husin, S. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan (Tarmizi, Ed.; 1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Manan, B. (1994). Hubungan antara Pusat dan Daerah Menurut UUD 1945. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Sadyohutomo, M. (2016). Tata Guna Tanah dan Penyerasian Tata Ruang. Pustaka Belajar.

Sanjiwani, P. K. (2016). Pengaturan Hukum terhadap Privatisasi Sempadan Pantai oleh Pengusaha Pariwisata di Provinsi Bali. Analisis Pariwisata, 16(1).

Soekanto, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (1st ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soemarsono, M. (2017). Negara Hukum Indonesia Ditinjau dari Sudut Teori Tujuan Negara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 37(2), 300â€“322. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol37.no2.1480

Sucy, D., & Murniwati, R. (2023). Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Penyusunan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Hak atas Lingkungan Hidup. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(2), 1063â€“1084.