Characteristics of Kiblat Films and The Application of Article 156a Kuhp To Blasphemy

Authors

  • Nabila Dian Universitas Bojonegoro
  • Mochamad Mansur Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro

Keywords:

Article 156a KUHP, Blasphemy, Kiblat Movie.

Abstract

This research examines the characteristics of the ‘Kiblat’ film that caused controversy and the implementation of article 156a KUHP to blasphemy cases. This research aims to clarify whether the film ‘Kiblat’ is blasphemy or freedom of expression, as well as ensure consistent legal protection for religious people, enforce the law against blasphemy, and prevent potential social conflicts. This study uses a type of normative legal research.  The results of this study show that the ‘Kiblat’ film is considered to insult Islam by displaying religious symbols inappropriately. This raises concerns about the negative impact on religious harmony and violates Article 156a KUHP regarding blasphemy. Laws such as the ITE Law also function to regulate the dissemination of content that can cause hatred, especially related to religion. The government has an important role to play maintaining a balance between freedom of expression and respect for religious values.

References

Ardiansyah, Risnita, and M. Syahran Jailani. 2023. “Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif.” Jurnal IHSAN?: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 1 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57.
Asnawati. 2016. “Penistaan/Penodaan Agama Dalam PersPektif Pemuka Agama Islam Di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB).” Harmoni Jurnal Multkultur & Multireligius 15 (1): 129–44.
Azzahrah, Azka Aulia, and Dinie Anggraeni Dewi. 2021. “Toleransi Pada Warga Negara Di Indonesia Berlandaskan Sila Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.” De Cive?: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 1 (6): 173–78. https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v1i6.229.
Budiman, Bachtiar Nur. 2021. “Populisme Di Indonesia Sebagai Ancaman Polarisasi Masyarakat.” Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 01 (02): 235–46. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v1i2.53.
Cahyadi, Devie Vyatri Permata. 2024. “Buntut Aksi Boikot Film ‘KIBLAT’, MUI Tegaskan Larangan Black Campaign Ajaran Agama Dalam Film Horor Indonesia,.” KapanLagi.Com. 2024. https://www.kapanlagi.com/Showbiz/Film/Indonesia/Buntut-Aksi-Boikot-Film-Kiblat-Mui-Tegaskan-Larangan-Black-Campaign-Ajaran-Agama-Dalam-Film-Horor-Indonesia-8dba5a.Html?Page=2.
Danim, Sudarman. 2002. Menjadi Peneliti Kualintatif. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
David tan. 2021. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8 (5): 1332–36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/490668614.pdf.
Erlandi, Gede Agastia. 2019. “Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Terkait Penghinaan Agama.” Jurist-Diction 1 (2): 537. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v1i2.11007.
Fahrudin, Ahmad Yogi, Ardiansyah, and Bintang Wicaksono Ajie. 2024. “Hukum Pidana Dan Konflik Agama: Menganalisis Kasus Penistaan Agama Dan Dampak Sosialnya.” Humaniorum 1 (4): 116–23. https://doi.org/10.37010/hmr.v1i4.32.
Ghany, Farel Al, Waspada Santing, and Basri Oner. 2022. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Melalui Media Sosial.” Clavia 20 (2): 195–205. https://doi.org/10.56326/clavia.v20i2.1652.
Hatta, Muhammad, and Husni Zulfan. 2021. “Kejahatan Penistaan Agama Dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya.” Al-Adl?: Jurnal Hukum 13 (2): 342. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v13i2.4532.
Ibrahim, Johnny. 2006. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. 57th ed. malang: Bayumedia Publishing. uri: https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20136084&lokasi=lokal%0A.
Indonesia, CNN. 2024. “LSF Beber Alasan Film Kiblat Belum Lulus Sensor.” CNN Indonesia. 2024. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/hiburan/20240325185149-220-1078844/lsf-beber-alasan-film-Kiblat-belum-lulus-sensor.
Lengkong, Lonna Yohanes, and Tomson Situmeang. 2023a. “Makna Delik Penodaan Agama Dalam Pasal 156a KUHP Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP.” JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) 9 (4): 118. https://doi.org/10.29210/020232682.
———. 2023b. “Makna Delik Penodaan Agama Dalam Pasal 156a KUHP Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP.” JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) 9 (4): 121.
Mahfudin, Muhammad Rifki. 2024. “Film Horor Kiblat Disebut Penistaan Agama: Orang-Orang Jadi Takut Salat, Bukan Makin Rajin, Kok Bisa?” AYOBANDUNG.Com 2. https://www.ayobandung.com/umum/7912255301/film-horor-Kiblat-disebut-penistaan-agama-orang-orang-jadi-takut-salat-bukan-makin-rajin-kok-bisa?page=2.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.
———. 2019. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nasution, Latipah. 2020. “Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi Dalam Ruang Publik Di Era Digital.” ’Adalah 4 (3): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i3.16200.
Prasetyo, Kresna Adi, and Ridwan Arifin. 2019. “Analisis Hukum Pidana Mengenai Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Di Indonesia.” Gorontalo Law Review 2 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i1.461.
i.” Jurnal Religion: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya 1 (2): 13–20.
Sanjaya, Livianto, and Firman Wijaya. 2019. “ANALISIS KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT TERHADAP AGAMA MENURUT PASAL 156A KUHP (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 784/PID/2018/PT.MDN).” Adigama 2 (2): 1–19.
Utoyo, Marsudi. 2012. “Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Oleh Kelompok Aliran Di Indonesia.” Pranata Hokum 7 (1): 15–26.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-11

Issue

Section

Articles