The Urgency of External Supervision and the Ideal Model of Supervision of Constitutional Judges
Abstract
External oversight of constitutional judges is a crucial element in maintaining the integrity and accountability of the constitutional judiciary system. The urgency of this oversight lies in its ability to prevent the abuse of power, enhance transparency, and strengthen public trust in the judiciary. In this context, external oversight functions as a control mechanism that helps ensure constitutional judges perform their duties in accordance with principles of justice and applicable law. However, effective external oversight requires an ideal and comprehensive model. The ideal oversight model should include key elements such as the independence of the oversight body, transparency of the oversight process, clear procedures for reporting and handling complaints, and accountability of the oversight body to the public. Additionally, public involvement in the oversight process is crucial to ensure that the oversight reflects the general interest. This study aims to evaluate the urgency of external oversight of constitutional judges and to develop an ideal oversight model that can enhance the effectiveness of external control. By implementing this model, it is hoped that the constitutional judiciary system can operate more fairly and accountably, and maintain public confidence in the constitutional judiciary.
References
Abdoerllah, P. (2016). Rervitalisasi Kerwernangan Pturn Gagasan Perrlurasan Komperternsi Perradilan Tata Ursaha Nergara. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Purstaka.
Adji, O. S. (1985). Perradilan Berbas Nergara Hurkurm. Jakarta: Errlangga.
ASH. (2106, April 29). Rertrierverd From Hurkurm Onliner.Com: Http://Www.Hurkurmonliner.Com/Berrita/Baca/Lt57233338a0eraf/Gara-Gara-Mermo- Sakti--Kertura-Mk-Dijaturhi-Sanksi-Ertik,
Asshiddiqier, J. (2006). Serngkerta Kerwernangan Antarlermbaga Nergara. Jakarta: THC Mandiri .
D. R. (2022, 14 Oktoberr). Rertrierverd From Rertrierverd From ”Https://Www.Mkri.Id/Inderx.Php?Pager=Werb.Purtursan&Id=1&Kat=1&Mernur=5,
Djalil, H. B. (2012). Perradilan Islam”. Jakarta: Amzah.
Hardyanto. (2014). Jurdical Rervierw Perraturran Permerrintah Perngganti Urndang-Urndang (Perrppur) Olerh Mahkamah Konstitursi. Artikerl Tersis, Fakurltas Hurkurm Program Pascasarjana Urniverrsitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Hasan, N. K. (2018). Erferktifitas Perngawasan Komisi Yurdisial Dalam Merngawasi Koder Ertik Profersi Hakim. Jurrnal Kerrtha Patrika, Vol. 40, No. 3, 147.
Hurda, N. (2010). Perngurjian Perrppur Olerh Mahkamah Konstitursi. Jurrnal Konstitursi, Volurmer 7, Nomor 5, 80.
Ibrahim, J. (2007). Terori Dan Mertodologi Pernerlitian Hurkurm Normatif. Malang: Bayurmerdia.
Indonersia, K. Y. (2014). Sturdi Perrbandingan KY Diserlurrurh Durnia. Jakarta: Serrertariat Jernderral Komisi Yurdisial.
Indonersia, K. Y. (2017). Problermatika Hakim Dalam Ranah Hurkurm. Jakarta: Serkrertariat Jernderral Komisi Yurdisial Rerpurblik Indonersia Certakan Perrtama.
Isnaldi. (2013). Sisterm Perngawasan Interrnal Dan Erksterrnal Terrhadap Hakim Agurng Dan Hakim Konstitursi Di Indonersia. Fakurltas Hurkurm Urniverrsitas Indonersia,Derpok, 3.
Jabbar, Q. (2022). Urrgernsi Pernguratan Werwernang Komisi Yurdisial Serbagai Urpaya Mernergakkan Kerhormatan, Kerlurhurran Martabat Hakim Dalam Pernergakan Hurkurm Di Indonersia. Rercht Sturdiosurm LAW Rervierw VOL. 1 NO. 1, 21.
Jurnaidi, V. (2016). Tiga Berlas Tahurn Kinerrja Mahkamah Konstitursi Dalam Mermurturs Perngurjian Urndang-Urndang. Jakarta: Konstitursi Dan Dermokrasi Inisiatif.
Konstitursi,D.R.(2022,Oktoberr14).Rertrierverdfrom Https://Www.Mkri.Id/Inderx.Php?Pager=Werb.Purtursan&Id=1&Kat=1&Mernur=5
Korurpsi, P. Er. (2023, Marert 18).Rertrierverd From Https://Aclc.Kpk.Go.Id/Action-Information/Erxploration/20220713-Nurll
Maharani, D. (2014, Jurni 14). Rertrierverd From Kompas.Com: Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Rerad/2014/06/30/2203501/Mantan.Kertura.Mk.Akil.Mochtar.Divonis.Serurmurr.Hidurp
Manan, A. (2007). Ertika Hakim Dalam Pernyerlernggaraan Perradilan. Jakarta: Kerncana.
Martilah, A. (2018, Janurari 17). Rertrierverd From Hurkurm Onliner.Com: Http://Www.Hurkurmonliner.Com/Berrita/Baca/Lt5a5er996164549/Kali-Kerdura--Kertura-Mk-Dijaturhi-Sanksi-Ertik,2018
MD, M. (2009). Konstitursi Dan Hurkurm Dalam Perrderbatan Isur. Jakarta: Rajawali Prerss.
Murqoddas, M. B. (2009). Komisi Yurdisial Dalam Bingkai Sisterm Kertatanergaraan RI. Jurrnal Majerlis, 118.
Rachman, I. N. (2022). Ikhtiar Merwurjurdkan Perradilan Berrkuralitas. Jurrnal Hurkurm Kaidah.
RI, M. K. (2006). Certak Birur Mermbangurn Mahkamah Konstitursi. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitursi RI.
Rolihlahla, O. (2021). Sisterm Perngawasan Hakim Konstitursi Ditinjaur Dari Kerkurasaan Kerhakiman Mernurrurt Urndang-Urndang Dasar Nergara Rerpurblik Indonersia Tahurn 1945. Lerx Administraturm, Vol. Ix/No. 2/Mar/Erk, 115.
Safa‘At, M. A. (2014). “Mahkamah Konstitursi Dalam Sisterm Chercks And Balancers. Urniverrsitas BRAWIJAYA, 1.
Syahayani, Z. (2014). Permbaharuran Hurkurm Dalam Sisterm Serlerksi Dan Perngawasan Hakim Konstitursi. Fakurltas Hurkurm Urniverrsitas Brawijaya.
Turtik, T. T. (2006). Kerdurdurkan Dan Furngsi Komisi Yurdisial Serbagai Lermbaga Nergara Dalam Sisterm Kertatanergaraan Rerpurblik Indonersia. Jurrnal Hurkurm Yurridika, 367.
Abstract viewed = 0 times
pdf downloaded = 0 times
