Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Terhadap Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Putusan Nomor 02/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN DPS

  • I Kadek Warga Pernada Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Made Sepud Faculty of Law, Universitas Warmadewa
  • Diah Gayatri Sudibya Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: Judge Decision, Replacement Money, Criminal act, Corruption

Abstract

Corruption is an act that violates the law in terms of detrimental state finances, regional finances, financial institutions/ agencies obtained from official government assistance. The effort to restore lost state finances is by providing additional penalties such as payment of substitute money. The problems of this study include: 1. What is the Qualification of the Criminal Arrangement for Additional Substitution by the Public Prosecutor in Corruption Crime (Decision Number 02 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN DPS)? and 2. What are the obstacles to the implementation of a judge's decision by the prosecutor as the executor of substitute money as an additional criminal act of corruption (Decision Number 02 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN DPS) ?. The research method used is Empirical Research. The results of the study can be concluded that criminal acts of corruption are systematic and organized crimes, which are usually carried out by people who are important in a society. Efforts to return assets resulting from corruption from perpetrators of corruption, namely by providing article 18 of Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by law No. 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption in the case of criminal additions to substitute money. Constraints in implementing the judge's decision are: Recognition of convoluted convicts on corrupt property, the amount of proceeds from corruption that is difficult to find. Efforts are made, namely: carrying out assets tracking actions on property owned, confiscating and auctioning off the assets of the convicted person and depositing the results of the auction to the State Treasury.

References

Ginanjar, M., Ali, D., & Mahfud, M. (2016). Eksekusi Uang Pengganti terhadap Terpidana dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Kejaksaan Tinggi Aceh. KANUN : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(2). Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/kanun/article/view/5927

Hadipratikto, M. (2012). Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 2(2). Retrieved from http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/nestor/article/view/1020

Hartanti, E. (2009). Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Suratman, & Dillah, P. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Published
2020-06-03
Abstract viewed = 230 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 1711 times