Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Sebagai Kurir dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika

  • I Wayan Govinda Tantra Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali
  • Made Minggu Widiantara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa
  • Luh Putu Suryani Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali
Keywords: Accountability, Child, Courier, Narcotics

Abstract

The involvement of the child in narcotic crime that becomes a narcotic courier is a series of malicious agreement in conducting illegal narcotics circulation, but in the capacity category of children who become courier, this is one thing That is so concerned that the child has been faced with the law and is classified as a narcotic crime. Based on the explanation above, the problems that will be considered in this study are as follows: 1. how is the legal arrangement for a child to be a courier in a narcotic crime? 2. How is criminal liability for children as a courier in narcotic crime? The type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research. The analysis technique is that after the collected legal materials are then analyzed using the technique of description, after all required legal materials are fulfilled, analyzed in a qualitative descriptive. Please note that the determination of the child's age in relation to the criminal liability that can be submitted before the proceeding is 12 (twelve) years up to 18 (eighteen) years in accordance with the verdict of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUUVIII/ 201/021. In the context of child accountability as a drug courier one of them is that narcotics LAW does not restrict the age in the judiciary, both adults and minors, so that children as narcotics courier can still be punished when Children's capabilities that are still limited and are not as perfect as adults.

References

Adi, K. (2014). Diversi Tindak Pidana Narkotika Anak. Malang: Setara Press.

Gultom, M. (2014). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dan Perempuan. Bandung: Refika Aditama. Retrieved from https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS7357.INLIS000000000002265

Hamdan. (2012). Alasan Penghapus Pidana (Teori dan Studi Kasus). Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Hidayat, A. S., Anam, S., & Helmi, M. I. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Kurir Narkotika. SALAM;Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syar-I, 5(3), 307–330. Retrieved from http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/salam/article/download/10416/pdf

Mardani. (2008). Penyalahgunaan Narkoba dalam Perpektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL22975896M/Penyalahgunaan_narkoba_dalam_perspektif_hukum_Islam_dan_hukum_pidana_nasional

Sedarmayanti, & Hidayat, S. (2002). Metodelogi Penelitian. Bandung: Mandar Maju. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/metodologi-penelitian-hj-sedarmayanti-syarifuddin-hidayat-19560.html

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (1995). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Retrieved from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=8027

Sudarsono. (1995). Kenakalan Remaja Prevensi, Rehabilitas Dan Resosialisasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Wulandari, A. Y., & Sambas, N. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Dibawah Umur yang menjadi Kurir Narkotika Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Seminar Penelitian Sivitas Akademika Unisba, 3(1), 55–61. Retrieved from http://karyailmiah.unisba.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/5469

Published
2020-07-20
Abstract viewed = 882 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 4506 times