Group Dynamics Among Beef Cattle Farmers in Merak Hamlet, Sumberwaru Village, Situbondo Regency

Dede Aprylasari; Siti Azizah; Titanio Auditya Pribadi

Dede Aprylasari Mulawarman University
Siti Azizah
Titanio Auditya Pribadi

Keywords: Dynamics Group, Baluran National Park, Livestock Business

Abstract

This research aims to get an overview of group dynamics, measure dynamism, and find out the relationship between livestock group dynamism and the level of ability to carry out beef cattle farming activities. This research was conducted in Merak Hamlet, Sumberwaru Village, Situbondo Regency, from February to April 2024. The population in this study was all members of the livestock group, totaling 24 people. Took Respondents from all group members who participated in grazing their livestock. Regarding data collection, researchers used observation, interviews, and documentation methods. The data was collected and analyzed using descriptive analysis; the second analysis is the dynamic category, and the third is the Spearman Rank correlation analysis. The results of the research show that 1) in one year one adult female cow produces one calf, each member of the group has 4-11 cows, the total number of cattle in Merak Hamlet is 1,442 heads; 2) The dynamism of the cattle farming business is based on goals, structure, function, guidance, cohesiveness, atmosphere, effectiveness, pressure and hidden intentions, on average farmer breeders are satisfied with an average score of 3.916 (78.33%) with a distribution of 22 people (92%), while farmer breeders opinion is quite satisfied as much as 0.08 (8.33%); 3) The relationship between group dynamism and the ability to carry out cattle farming business in livestock groups in Merak Hamlet is of opinion that they are satisfied with an average score of 4.08 (81.66%), while based on The results of the Sperm Rank analysis of dynamic relationships including age have a real relationship to group dynamics where the value of R is more significant than R. Meanwhile, the relationship between ability including age has a real relationship where the value of Rstable is greater than Rstable: age (0.723>0.409), formal education (0.689>0.409), non-formal (0.789>0.409), experience (0.690>0.409).

References

Aprylasari, D., Azizah, S., Man, N., Siswijono, S. B., Djunaidi, I. H., Wati, A. M., & Rachmawati, A. (2022). Peasant women empowerment as a conflict resolution strategy in Sidomulyo Hamlet, Baluran National Park. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science), 32(3), 437-451.

Santosa, S. (1999). Dinamika Kelompok. Surabaya. Bumi Aksara

Mardikanto, T. (1993). Penyuluhan pembangunan pertanian. Surakarta. UNS Press.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Falo, M. (2016). Kajian dinamika kelompok tani usaha ternak sapi potong di kelompok tani nekmese desa manusasi kecamatan miomaffo barat. Agrimor, 1(01), 15-18.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Metodologi penelitian suatu pendekatan proposal. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 16, 337

Djarwanto, P. S., & Subagyo, P. (2001). Mengenal beberapa uji statistik dalam penelitian. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Leilani, A., & Hasan, O. S. (2006). Analisis Dinamika Kelompok Pada Kelompok Tani Mekar Sari Desa Purwasari Kecamatan Dramaga Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Penyuluhan Pertanian, 1(1), 18-27.

Elsiana, E., Satmoko, S., & Gayatri, S. (2018). Pengaruh Fungsi Kelompok Terhadap Kemandirian Anggota pada Kelompok Tani Padi Organik di Paguyuban Al-Barokah Desa Ketapang, Kecamatan Susukan Kabupaten Semarang, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 2(2), 111-118.

Mutiawardhana, R., Handayanta, E., & Emawati, S. (2013). Model pemberdayaan masyarakat berbasis peternakan di daerah pertanian lahan kering Desa Kemejing Kecamatan Semin Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Tropical Animal Husbandry, 2(1), 41-50.

Yunasaf, U., Ginting, B., Slamet, M., & Tjitropranoto, P. (2008). Peran kelompok peternak dalam mengembangkan keberdayaan peternak sapi perah (Kasus di Kabupaten Bandung). Jurnal Penyuluhan, 4(2), 109-115.

Rakhmat, J. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi. Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke-24. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Mardikanto, T. (2011). Konsep-konsep pemberdayaan masyarakat: acuan bagi aparat birokrasi, akademis, praktisi, dan pemerhati/pengamat/pemberdayaan masyarakat. UTP Penerbitan dan UNS Press. Surakarta.

Faqih, A. (2011). Hubungan antara karakteristik petani dan dinamika kelompok tani dengan keberhasilan program PUAP. Prosiding SNaPP: Sosial, Ekonomi dan Humaniora, 2(1), 309-316.

Tambas, J. S. (2018). Dinamika Kelompok Tani Kalelon Di Desa Kauneran Kecamatan Sonder. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 14(3), 55-66.

Matondang, I. E., Muatip, K., & Sodiq, A. (2013). Dinamika kelompok tani ternak sapi potong program sarjana membangun desa (SMD) periode 2010-2012. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan, 1(3), 1095-1106.Padmanegara, S. 1996. Pendidikan Pertanian untuk Petani. Ekstensia Volume II Tahun II, Pusat Penyuluhan Pertanian, Jakarta

Azizah, S., Pt, S., & Sos, M. (2024). Kemitraan Broiler di Indonesia: Tinjauan Komunikasi Pembangunan. Yayasan Drestanta Pelita Indonesia.

Maryam, M., Paly, M. B., & Astati, A. (2016). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penentu pendapatan usaha peternakan sapi potong (Studi kasus Desa Otting Kab. Bone). Jurnal Ilmu dan Industri Peternakan, 3(1).

Rosmawati, H. (2014). Analisis Curahan Waktu Tenaga Kerja Wanita pada Usaha Ternak Sapi Potong di Desa Mendayun Kecamatan Madang Suku I Kabupaten OKU Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah AgrIBA, 2, 17-26.

Mauludin, M. A. (2012). Peran Kelompok dalam Mengembangkan Keberdayaan Peternak Sapi Potong (Kasus Di Wilayah Selatan Kabupaten Tasikmalaya) Role of the Group in Developing Beef Cattle Farmers Empowerment (A Case Study in Tasikmalaya South Region of Kabupaten Tasikmalaya). Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Universitas Padjadjaran, 12 (2), 1-8.