Authority Analysis of Counting the State Financial Loss in the Investigation of Criminal Act of Corruption in Indonesia (Study at the BPK Representative Office and BPKP Lampung Province)

I Ketut Seregig, Bambang Hartono, R Riagung

Abstract


The authority to calculate the state losses in corruption, until now, is still a problem that must be addressed with government policy in conducting investigations Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) and Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP). Both of these bodies in issuing products for calculating state losses, apply different process of completing the product of the investigation conducted. Information from Indonesian Republic Police (Polri) investigators prefer the BPKP as a partner in determining state losses in a criminal act upon request of the investigators to BPKP to calculate the state losses. The method used in this study normative research and the approaches used are juridical and empirical approaches. The results of the study is BPK pursuant to Law No. 15 of 2006 has the authority to calculate State losses carried out by the Main Investigator Auditor (AUI) which has the authority to conduct Investigation Examinations, Although the Supreme Audit Agency Acts and has the authority to calculate State losses,. In addition to the BPK there are other bodies that have the authority to calculate State lossesy, that is Corruption Criminal Investigators that are more likely to use BPKP to calculate State losses compared to BPK.

Keywords


authority, state loss, corruption

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alatas, S. H. (1986). Sosiologi Korupsi, Sebuah Penjelajahan dengan Data Kontemporer. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Bramastyo, N. A., Endrawati, L., & Zakaria, A. (2014). Laporan Audit Investigasi Sebagai Bukti Permulaan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-008-0726-4

Kim, D. S., Li, Y., & Tarzia, D. (2018). Value of corruption in China: Evidence from anti-corruption investigation. Economics Letters, 164(March), 112–116.

Mardiasmo. (2004). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Muchsan. (1981). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Administrasi Negara Dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Sihombing, S. O. (2018). Youth perceptions toward corruption and integrity: Indonesian context. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.03.004

Talvitie, A. (2017). Observed Differences in Corruption between Asia and Africa: The Industrial Organization of Corruption and Its Cure. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4476–4494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.357

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Hasil Amandemen.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Sebagai Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1973 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/scj.2.1.931.46-57

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats