DEBT FORGIVENESS PRINCIPLE IN BUSINESS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

  • Pebry Dirgantara Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana
Keywords: Bankruptcy, debt remaining, forgiveness debt principle

Abstract

The aims of this research is on the form of engagement between bankrupt debtors on the remaining debt that has not been paid to creditors based on PKPU UUK and the form of debt forgiveness principles as a form of business legal renewal, especially regarding the debtor's liability to the remaining debt to its creditors. The methods of this research is uses 3 (three) sources of legal material, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The primary legal material obtained from the field is first examined for completeness and clarity to be classified as well as systematic and consistent preparation to facilitate analysis. Secondary legal materials obtained from the literature are selected and collected systematically, so that they can be used as a reference in conducting analysis. From the results of the legal material of library research and the field, a descriptive analytical discussion was conducted. The result of research found Based on the bankruptcy settlement stipulated in the PKPU UUK, it can be seen that with the existence of a bankrupt decision against a debtor, in which the settlement still leaves the remainder of the debt, the agreement between the debtor and his creditors will not end or break before the debt is repaid and The existence of the debt forgiveness principle characterizes that in a business can not be separated from a risk and / or uncertainty and all things that have the potential to harm the business and can even bankrupt the legal subject business.

References

Ginting, V. R., Firdaus, & Fitriani, R. (2015). Analisis Terhadap Penolakan Perdamaian Pada Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu) Oleh Kreditur Separatis Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 2(1), 1–15.

Irianto, C. (2015). Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaraan Utang. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4(3), 399–418.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Udayana. (2015). Buku Pedoman Pendidikan Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Udayana. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Pramudya, A. (2017). Penormaan Prinsip Debt Forgiveness Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Di Indonesia. Universitas Airlangga.

Setiawan, I. K. O. (2017). Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Shubhan, H. (2009). Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan (Cetakan Ke). Jakarta: Kencana.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sunggono, B. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (UUK PKPU), Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443

Published
2019-07-15
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 180 times
PDF downloaded = 263 times