Interpersonal Function in Martin Luther King Jr’s Speech

  • Forisman Hulu Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Nias Selatan
Keywords: Interpersonal function, personal pronoun, speech, speech function

Abstract

This research aims was to discover the interpersonal function types and to explores their realization within the speech. This research was conducted by using qualitative research design. The data was taken from the website which are readily accessible to the public. After that, the data is divided into clauses form. Next, the data was analyzed based on Halliday’s theory through many steps of data analysis by Cresswell. The results of data analysis showed that Martin Luther King Jr applied: (1) Speech Function (statement, command, and question); Mood (declarative, imperative and interrogative); Modality (high, median, and low); Tense Shift (present, future, and past) and Personal Pronoun (First Personal Pronoun, Second Personal Pronoun and Third Personal Pronoun). (2) speech function (statement was a most dominant, command was the second dominant and question was less); Mood (declarative was most dominant, imperative was the second dominant and interrogative was less); modality (median was most dominant, high was the second, and low was rare); personal pronoun (we was used frequently) and tense shift (present tense was majority, future was a second place, and past tense was less). So based result above, it was concluded that Martin Luther King Jr gave much infomation. Therefore, this speech was called as an informative speech. Considering the result above, the researcher suggested orator use many pronoun “we†when delivering a speech and the university students learn interpersonal function.

References

Bank, D. (2010). The interpersonal metafunction in French from systemic functional perspective. Language Science. 32(3), 395-407.

Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach (3rd ed). California: Sage Publication Inc.

Feng, H., & Liu, Y. (2010). Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Public Speeches: A Case Study of Obama’s Speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 825-829.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: AEE Publishing

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C, M, I, M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Jingxia, Liu., Na, S., & Qing, Z. (2015). Interpersonal Interpretation of Personal Pronoun in Marriage Advertising. Research Journal of English Language and Literature. 3 (1) 18-25.

Kemdikbud (2014). Bahasa Inggris/Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Kemedikbud.

Morley, G. D. (2000). Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. London: Continuum.

Nur, S. (2015). Analysis Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches: A Case Study of Nelson Mandela’s Presidential Inauguration Speech. The International Journal of Social Sciences. 30(1), 52-63.

Prasetyo, T. D. (2013). An Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis Of Persuasive Speeches Produced By Speaking 4 Class Students Of English Education Department Of Yogyakarta State University In The Academic Year Of 2012/2013. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Setyowati, A. L. (2016). Interpersonal Meaning Analysis In Short Story Of Hans Christian Andersen The Real Princess. University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Verderber, R. F., Verderber K. S., & Sellnow D. D. (2008). The Challenge of Effective Speaking. Toronto: Lyn Uhl.

Webster, J. L. (2012). Introduction to Public Speaking (2nd ed). Shreveport: Louisiana State University.

Yang, H. (2017). The Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Barack Obama’s Inaugural Address. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics. 3(1), 27-31

Published
2019-05-17
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 1622 times
PDF downloaded = 915 times