A Functional Analysis Of Transitivity And Attitude Systems Interacting In Student Texts In Spanish
Abstract
This paper presents a systemic functional analysis of three types of processes in academic texts: verbal, mental and relational. It intends to explore how certain process types in Spanish are related to the expression of evaluation in academic texts. Our study draws on Systemic Functional Linguistics and, in particular, on the Appraisal Theory (J. R. Martin & White, 2005), which explores evaluative aspects of the language, here we shall analyze only one of its subsystems, Attitude. The method of this research is counting the number of words and clauses in our corpora and registered the frequency of verbal, mental and relational processes in these clauses. Our analysis is based on student texts collected at the Faculty of Arts, belonging to two disciplines: literature and history, but to only one genre: question-answer. The preliminary results show certain differences between the two corpora: in the literature texts clauses with appraisal prevail and judgment is the preferred means of expressing Attitude, while the history texts prefer clauses without appraisal and appreciation prevails among the subtypes of Attitude.References
Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar Of French: From Grammar To Discourse. London: Continuum.
Chen, L. (2005). Transitivity In Media Texts: Negative Verbal Process Sub-Functions And Narrator Bias. International Review Of Applied Linguistics In Language Teaching, 43(1), 33–51.
Chen, L. (2007). Analysing Attitude: Positive Verbal Process Sub-Functions And Media Bias. Rask, International Journal Of Language And Communication, 25, 25–55.
Coffin, C. & Hewings, A. 2004. Ielts Preparation For Tertiary Writing: Distinctive Interpersonal And Textual Strategies. In: Ravelli, L. & Ellis, R. Academic Writing In Context: Social-Functional Perspectives On Theory And Practice. London: Continuum, P.153-17.
El Lenguaje Académico En Español. Análisis Binacional De Textos En Las Humanidades. (2009).
Forey, G. (2008). Projecting Clauses: Interpersonal Realization Of Control And Power In Workplace Texts. In In: Forey, G. & Thompson, G. (Eds) Text Type And Texture. (Pp. 151–172). London: Equinox.
Halliday, M. A. . (1994). An Introduction To Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation In Academic Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation In Text: Authorial Stance And The Construction Of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic Attribution: Citation And The Construction Of Disciplinary Knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3).
Ignatieva, N. (2011). Verbal Processes In Student Academic Writing In Spanish From A Systemic Functional Perspective. Lenguaje, 39(2), 447–467.
Ignatieva, N., & Colombi, M. C. (2014). Clae: Corpus Del Lenguaje Académico En Español De México Y Los Estados Unidos: Un Análisis Sistémico Funcional. México: Unam.
Ignatieva, N., & RodrÃguez-Vergara, D. (2015). Verbal Processes In Academic Language In Spanish: Exploring Discourse Genres Within The Systemic Functional Framework. Functional Linguistics, 2(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S40554-015-0014-9
Ignatieva, N., & Zamudio, V. (2012). A Perspectiva Funcional Dos Processos Verbais Nos Escritos Estudiantis De História E Literatura Em Espanhol. Delta, 28, 561–579.
Kaplan, N. (2007). La TeorÃa De La Valoración: Un Desarrollo De Los Estudios Sobre La Evaluación En El Lenguaje. En: BolÃvar A. (Ed.) Análisis Del Discurso. ¿Por Qué Y Para Qué? Caracas: Universidad Central.
Lavid, J. (2008). The Grammar Of Emotion In English And Spanish: A Systemic-Functional Approach. In Language To Multimodality: New Developments In The Study Of Ideational Meaning. (Pp. 67–85).
Martin, J. (1992). English Text. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language Of Evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Https://Doi.Org/10.31468/Cjsdwr.238
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical Cartography. English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.
Moss, G., & Miranda, D. C. (2011). La PedagogÃa De La Simplificación: La Enseñanza De Historia Por Medio De Pista Y Pezca. En:(Re) Construcción: Discurso, Identidad Y Nación En Los Manuales Escolares De Historia Y Y De Ciencias Sociales. Chile: Editorial Cuarto Propio.
Moss, G., & Mizuno, G. (2015). Las Voces Del Texto. In Texto Escolar Y El Aprendizaje. Segunda Edición. (Barletta M, Pp. 89–117). El Colombia: Universidad Del Norte.
Navarro, F. (2014). Gradación Y Compromiso En Escritura Académica Estudiantil De Humanidades. Análisis Contrastivo Desde La TeorÃa De La Valoración. Estudios De LingüÃstica Aplicada, 60, 9–33.
O’donnell, M., Zappavigna, M., & Whitelaw, C. (2008). A Survey Of Process Type Classification Over Difficult Cases. In Language To Multimodality: New Developments In The Study Of Ideational Meaning (In: Jones, Pp. 47–64). London: Equinox.
Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract viewed = 445 times
PDF downloaded = 459 times
